Usha Rajput v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4950 of 2021 Usha Rajput W/o Ram Prasad Rajput, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Qr. No. 243/16, Podibahar Road, Ravishankar Shukla Nagar, Korba Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Superintending Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Government Of Chhattisgarh Undertaking, Vidyut Sewa Bhawan, Danganiya Raipur, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. The Executive Director (Production) Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Marwa, Janjgir Champa, District Janjir Champa, Chhattisgarh 495668.
3. The Chief Engineer (Production) 2 ABVTPS, Marwa, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh.
4. The Senior Divisional Medical Officer, Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Marwa, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 16.09.2021
1. The grievance of petitioner in the present writ petition seems to be the non-granting of House Rent Allowance (in short "HRA") to the petitioner.
2. According to the petitioner, she has been staying in a private residence while working under the respondents. In spite of the fact
that the petitioner was residing in a private residence, she has not been paid house rent allowance. According to the petitioner, since her husband also is working under the respondents, he had also claimed for government accommodation commensurate to the entitlement of her husband but the same has also not been materialized till date.
3. Considering the aforesaid factual matrix of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the entire writ petition itself can be disposed of directing the respondents 2 to 4 to take an appropriate decision on the claim of petitioner for grant of HRA at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that the claim of petitioner has to be decided strictly in accordance with the quarter allotment rules and also the rules governing the field of House Rent Allowance.
4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai