Santosh Kumar Jangade v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4813 of 2018 Santosh Kumar Jangde S/o Shri Puni Ram Aged About 33 Years Working As Jr. Assistant, Chhattisgarh, State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Presently Posted At Raipur, R/o Flat No. G- 09, P. W. D. Colony, Raj Bhawan, Civil Lines Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department, Block 2, Third Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies, Corporation Limited, Hitvada Complex, Avanti Vihar Colony, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Manager, (Administration), Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Hitvada Complex, Avanti Vihar Colony, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. The District Manager, Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Raipur, Aaporti Bhawan, Sector 1, Devendra Nagar, District Office Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5. The District Manager, Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Dantewada, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh.

6. Shri Ashok Nigam, Contingency Jr. Assistant, Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For Petitioner :

Dr. N.K. Shukla, Sr. Advocate Mr. Vikram Sharma, Advocate For State :

Mr. R.N. Pusty, Govt. Advocate For Respondents No. 2 to 5 :

Mr. V.R. Tiwari, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 20/08/2018

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is to the order of transfer dated 17.07.2018 (Annexure P/8), whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Arang, District Raipur to Dantewada on administrative grounds.

2. During the course of the arguments, the counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner has in between joined his duties at the transferred place of posting at Dantewada. He however submits that his representation against the order of transfer is still pending consideration before the authorities concerned and which till date has not been decided and the order of transfer of petitioner to Dantewada is in violation of various provisions of the transfer policy and the respondents may be directed to ensure a prompt decision on the said representation.

3. The said prayer of the petitioner is not opposed by the counsel for the respondents.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner in accordance with the transfer policy which is applicable in the department.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved