Vijay Dadsena v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.4168 of 2020 Vijay Dadsena S/o Amrit Lal Dadsena, aged about 35 years, Ex.Constable No.450, R/o Village Baradoli, Police StationBasana, Distt.-Mahasamund (CG) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG)

2. Director General of Police, Police Headquarter Raipur, District Raipur (CG)

3. Inspector General of Police, Raipur Range, Raipur (CG)

4. Superintendent of Police, Mahasamund, District-Mahasamund (CG) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Ishan Verma, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms Beenu Pathak, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 09/12/2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be allowed to prefer second appeal before the Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Raipur against the impugned appellate order.

2. Be that as it may, the petitioner is liberty to prefer second appeal before respondent No.2/Director General of Police within 30 days from today. If such an appeal is preferred, respondent No.2/Director General of Police would do well to consider and dispose off the same within 3 months from its presentation and to pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law.

3. With the aforesaid direction / observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed off. No order as to cost(s).

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Sanjay K.Agrawal) Judge B/-