S. M. Shageer v. Jagdish Lal Dua
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 220 of 2016 • S. M. Shageer S/o S.M. Akhtar, Aged About 65 Years Partner of M/s Fect Engineering Company, R/o Adarsh Nagar, Borsi Road, Tahsil And Distirct Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Jagdish Lal Dua S/o Amirchand Dua, Aged About 65 Years The Then Branch Manager, State Bank Of India, Supela Branch Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh
2. A.K. Kanekar, S/o Not Known, Aged About 66 Years The Then Branch Manager, State Bank Of India Supela Branch Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh
3. S.R. Barla, S/o Not Known, Aged About 69 Years The Then Regional Officer State Bank Of India, Shankar Nagar, Raipur Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh
4. B. Arya, S/o Not Known, Aged About 61 Years Senior Account Officer National Thermal Power Corporation, Darri, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh
5. N.C. Kothari, S/o Not Known, Aged About 61 Years Senior Engineer, National Thermal Power Corporation, Darri, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh
6. D.K. Shukla, S/o Not Known, Aged About 61 Years General Manager, National Thermal Power Corporation, Darri, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh
7. S.P.S. Chouhan, S/o Not Known, Aged About 71 Years Deputy Manager Civil National Thermal Power Corporation Darri, Korba District Korba Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner : Shri Prateek Sharma, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 14/09/2016
1. The present writ petition has been preferred by complainant of Criminal Case No.62/95 pending in the Court of CJM, Durg for a direction to the trial Court to expedite the trial.
2. It appears, on petitioner's complaint, offence has been registered against the respondents under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the IPC on 1.8.1995 and since then trial is pending in the Court of JMFC, Durg or CJM, Durg.
3. A reading of the order sheet of the trial Court recorded on 12.7.2011 would further indicate that on earlier occasion also, this Court has issued direction for early conclusion of trial.
4. Considering the fact that the trial is pending for the last 20 years, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to make all possible endeavour to conclude trial of Criminal Case No.62/95, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 8 months from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. Any violation of this order regarding disposal of the case within outer time limit shall be viewed seriously and it may reflect on the Annual Confidential Report of the Presiding Officer of the trial Court.
Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Barve