High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3787/2015disposed off

Vinod Kumar Bagde v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-10-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3787 of 2015 • Vinod Kumar Bagde, S/o Parasram Bagde, Aged about 42 years, R/o Shanti Nagar, Shankerpur, Ward No-10, Rajnandgaon, Revenue/Civil District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisarh, Through Secretry, Department of Health and Family Development, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur

2. Collector, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon

3. Chief Medical and Health OfÏcer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. Shashank Thakur, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 16/10/2015 Heard.

(2) Challenge in this petition is to the impugned order dated 29.09.2015, whereby, the petitioner, who is working on the post of Rural Health Organizer (RHO), has been rationalized and posted from Sub Health Centre, Kolarghat, Block Dongargarh District Rajnandgaon to Sub Health Centre, Kutelikala, Block Chhuiekhadan, District Rajnandgaon.

(3) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the respondent authorities raising his grievances in respect of his posting.

(4) No objection from the other side.

(5) Looking to the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation before the respondent authorities within a period of 15 days and thereafter, the competent authorities is directed to consider and decide his representation in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of 4 weeks from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. (6) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law on its own merits.

Sd/- J u d g e (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna