High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2339/2016disposed off

Tushar Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-09-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2339 of 2016 • Tushar Yadav S/o Uttamram Yadav, Aged About 26 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher- Panchayat, R/o Village Ludeg, Thana & Tah. Patthalgaon, Civil & Revenue District Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Van Vibhag, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue, Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Tahsildar, Tahsil Office, Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Project Officer, Office Of Project Officer, I.W.M.P. 09, Madiyadarha, Patthalgaon, Block Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Deeleshwar Khutiyan, S/o Bheemsen Khutiyan, Aged About 30 Years Occupation Secretary, Ekikrit Jalgrahan Keshtra Prabandhan Karykram, Mdiyadarha R/o Gram Ludeg, Thana Patthalgaon Tah. Patthalgaon, Civil & Revenue District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh)

7. Manoj Khutiya S/o Bhimshen Aged About 37 Years Occupation Thekedar, R/o Gram Ludeg, Thana Patthalgaon Tah. Patthalgaon, Civil & Revenue District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioner : Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Shri UNS Deo, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 19/09/2016

1. It is argued that respondent No.6, who is the Secretary of the Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Madiyadarha, Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, has engaged his real brother i.e. respondent No.7 Manoj Khuntiya for construction of pond (Dabhri) by using JCB machine and by preparing forged muster roll and a complaint made to the Collector has not been looked into.

2. Complaint (Annexure-P/2) does not bear any receipt of the concerned Collector, therefore, it does not appear as to whether the same was presented or not.

3. Be that as it may, considering the nature of complaint, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event the petitioner prefers fresh complaint before the concerned Collector within a period of 4 weeks from today, the Collector shall consider and decide the representation/complaint after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties and decide the same by a speaking order, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of submission. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Barve