High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/403/2016disposed off

Ramesh Kumar Shrivas v. Ganesh Shankar Mishra

2016-09-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Contempt Case (C) No.

of Ajay Kumar Singh, S/o Late Chandrabhan Singh Adhariya, Aged about 48 years, R/o Kapan, Tah. Akaltara, P.S. Naila, District Janjgir (C.G.) ---- Applicant

Versus

1. Ganesh Shankar Mishra, Secretary, Water Resourced Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)

2. Mithalesh Shukla, Research Officer, Quality Control Unit Sakti, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ---- Respondents Contempt Case (C) No.

of Ramesh Kumar Shrivas, S/o Late Paras Ram Shrivas, Aged about 49 years, R/o Village - Kapan, Tah. - Akaltara, P.S. Naila, District Janjgir (C.G.) ---- Applicant

Versus

1. Ganesh Shankar Mishra, Secretary, Water Resourced Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)

2. Mithalesh Shukla, Research Officer, Quality Control Unit Sakti, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ---- Respondents Contempt Case (C) No.

of Saroj Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Rambagas Sahu, Aged about 49 years, R/o Belari, Tah.- Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir (C.G.) ---- Applicant

Versus

1. Ganesh Shankar Mishra, Secretary, Water Resourced Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)

2. Mithalesh Shukla, Research Officer, Quality Control Unit Sakti, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ---- Respondents

Contempt Case (C) No.

of Manharan Lal Aghariya, S/o Late Kashiram, Aged about 50 years, R/o Kapan, Tah. -Akaltara, P.S. Naila, Distt. Janjgir (C.G.) ---- Applicant

Versus

1. Ganesh Shankar Mishra, Secretary, Water Resourced Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)

2. Mithalesh Shukla, Research Officer, Quality Control Unit Sakti, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Applicant : Shri K.P. S. Gandhi, Advocate. For Respondents : Shri Gopa Kumar, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 2 1 /0 9 /201 (1) Alleging that the respondents have not complied with the orders and directions issued by this court in Contempt Case (Civil) No.351/2016 dated 26.08.2016, the applicants are before this court in this contempt petition.

(2) Counsel for the respondents submit the order complained of dated 26.8.2016 has been complied with substantially as the applicants are working in the department concerned as dailywager in compliance of this Court's order dated 26.08.2016.

(3) In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents, the contempt petition petitions are closed. Rule issued is discharged.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-