High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5105/2016disposed off

Parmeshwar Prasad v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-12-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5105 of 2016 • Parmeshwar Prasad Sahu S/o Shri G. R. Sahu Aged About 34 Years Presently Working On The Post Of Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) Janpad Primary School Jerve Block Baloda Distt. Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Janjgir Champa, Distt. Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Baloda Distt. Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh (Janjgir 9 Distt. Janjgir Champa)

5. The Block Education Officer, Baloda Distt. Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent And WPS No. 5355 Of 2016 • Shiv Kumar Kahara S/o Shri Ramaiyalal Aged About 45 Years Presently Working On The Post Of Lecturer (Panchayat) Govt. Higher Secondary School Khisora Block Baloda District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Janjgir Champa, Distt. Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Baloda Distt. Janjgir

Champa (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh (Janjgir 9 Distt. Janjgir Champa)

5. The Block Education Officer, Baloda Distt. Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioners Shri A.N. Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents/State Shri Adhiraj Surana, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 14/12/2017

1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties would jointly and fairly submit that the issue involved in the present writ petitions have already been considered and decided by this Court on 28.11.2017 in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs State of Chhattisgarh and another), therefore, these writ petitions may be disposed of in terms of the order passed in Mukesh Kumar Patel (supra).

2. Accordingly, the present writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Mukesh Kumar Patel (supra). A copy of the order passed in Mukesh Kumar Patel (supra) be placed on record of the present writ petitions. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Akhilesh