Bhupendra Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.CR.C. No. 5380 of 2018 Bhupendra Sahu, S/o. Parasram Sahu, Aged About 28 Years, R/o.- VillageKona, Post- Jarhagaon, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through- Station House Officer, Police Station Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Applicant :
Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent :
Mr. Anupam Dubey, Dy.G.A.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board 24/08/2018 1.
This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.325/2018, registered at Police Station- Sarkanda, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 120-B, 419, 420, 467, 468 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. Applicant is in jail since 13.05.2018. Charge-sheet in this case has been filed after completion of investigation. The applicant was employee of Axix Bank and he has played no role in commission of the offence as alleged in this case. Hence, it is prayed that the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 3.
On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the bail application and the submission made in this respect. 4.
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record.
5.
The allegation against this applicant and other accused persons is this that some of the co-accused persons impersonated as Mohan Banjare
and obtained loan of Rs.16.000 Lakhs from Axix Bank. The allegation against this applicant is that he has completed formalities of filling of application and obtaining signature of the impersonator knowing well that the person is not Mohan Banjare.
6.
Considered the submissions made and the contents of the case diary. Considering on the entire material present in the case diary and subsequent to the filing of the charge -sheet, it appears that there is no further purpose to keep the applicant in jail, hence for this reason, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case, in which, this applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.
7.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed.
8.
It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Balram