Manharan Chelkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4192 of 2020

1. Manharan Chelkar S/o Shri Karanlal Chelkar, aged about 37 years, Occupation Class 4/Rashoiya Karmi Shash, Adiwasi Balak Ashram Belgahana, R/o Belgahana, Police Station Belgahana, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

2. Yogeshwar Sahu S/o Shri Bharatlal Sahu, aged about 39 years, Occupation Class 4/Rashoiya Karmi Shash, Prayas Awasiya Vidyalaya Bilaspur, R/o Near Nutan Colony, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Aadim Jati and Anushuchit Jati Vikash Vibhag, Mantralay Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner, Aadim Jati and Anusuchit Jati Vikas Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Assistant Commissioner, Aadiwashi Vikas Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents For Petitioners :- Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For State :- Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 20/10/2020

1. The Petitioners through the present Writ Petition seek for a direction to the Respondents to take decision on the claim of the Petitioners for placing their services as contingency paid employees.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that present Petitioners are working with the Respondents since 2010. The petitioners meanwhile had moved an application before the Respondents for considering their claim for placing them as contingency paid employee taking into consideration the past services of the Petitioners rendered with the Respondents.

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners have already made detailed representation before the authorities concerned which are pending consideration and have till now not been decided by the Respondents Authorities. Therefore, a limited direction may be issued to Respondent No. 3 to take appropriate decision on the claim of the Petitioners to consider their matter for being placed as contingency paid employee.

4. Learned State Counsel has no objection if the Petition is disposed off with a direction to Respondent No. 3 for considering the representation of the Petitioner.

5. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off with a direction to Respondent No. 3 to consider the representation made by the Petitioners and take decision on the claim of the Petitioners in accordance with the rules governing the field.

6. it is expected that Respondent No. 3 shall take a decision on the claim of the Petitioners as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 90 days from today.

7. With the aforesaid observation the present Writ Petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Pekde