Mithlesh Kumar Nirmalkar @ Golu Nirmalkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

§ est-a $3: fa":an >9' swish

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH

AT BILASPUR R, Criminal Revision No.

TI L of 2014 APPLICANT .::

Mithlesh Kumar Nirmalkar @ (in Jail) Golu Nirmalkar, S/o.

Lalji Nirmalkar, aged about years, R/o.

Village Atarmara, Police Station Rajim, Revenue District Gariaband and Civil District Raipur (C.G.) (I

Versus

/ o"

< RESPONDENT State of Chhattisgarh through Station House Officer, Police s+alion Rajim, Revenue District Gariaband and Civil District Roipwz (c.G.) CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION UNDER {SECTION e"

READ WITH SECTION OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Crime No.

187/13 Under Section 376, 417 IPC and Section 4,8 of Gender Act and 3 (1)(12) of Atrocity Act Police Station Rajim/ Cr. Case No.

69/ 13 in the Court of Special Judge (Atrocities), Raipur Status of the case Fixed for framing of charge Beirég.' aggrieved With the order in ordersheet dated 31.12.2013 passed by the Spec1al Judge f, (Atrocities) Raipur in Criminal Case No. 69/ 13 whereby the Court has accepted the prayer for DNA Test of ccused, complainant and the child but refused the a application for not framing charges till receiving of DNA Report, the applicant begs to prefer this revision on the follovving facts and grounds, amongst others.

HQGH EQURT QF CHHAITEQAEH KT EILASPER Sinnie Eench:

HQn'blg Shti Justigg P: Sam Kill}!

Qimina! Revisian Na: Tg 9i Emit £i§§icani b£i§1ia§h Kumar Mirmaikar (Q3, Gaiu Eiimaikar yEE$Li$ V Easmndéni'

Skate 3f Qhh ati'sggagh EiregentEhIE YV Q Eharma: caunsel far thg aggiiaant. $i'u'i Fwinci 3hu§§ia FL fur the 8Iaiel rawgnczém. Gra§ Wigw- «34132.2(:14;

E'g way Qf the insgtam: rgwisiou, the agglitant has; ¢hailangsc§ tiia nlder dated 31.11%13 gasggé by 5gee§a£ Jurjge. {Aimgiiaa'} Ea§gm iv?

Ltnfmiaai mag ND. 5%]?m3.

"F.hg g.Eeva.caa 9f tha agpikant is that a giiminai Page MG. 1.57..!13 haaa began. regigtgtgd againgf. him fai nffenre agg' .175, 41.? a? ER; 53mm 4,& 0f Gandar Act anlj 3m €32) 13f tha Amemeg Act / 2'

Fa...

igadmg ta the ingtant ariminai {Ewiginn i3 hat cagiplainant hag registemd g East; againsi the acausacf and. £113 gdéce ha5 iiiad £ha!§aa hgfmaa thg his! mutt andihg Qaga i3 {marl far fiaming Qf charges. The. anngicaat mavgd twu agplicatinm befme thiE iriai EALgE $.52 $312 .l. i.

Eppblicaiian was far gettiag QNA te3t ganduttezé L- a5 _.&.r%aéra £25 pgtgmitg a? thF ghéid ham ta tha vigtim pmsazukix and Sewnd agpiigatien wag that far nrjf kaming :hargess ti§§ remiving Qf DNA fawn: Qn Ennaiderai§£3n 5f agpliaah'an the trial calm Vida its, judgment dataii 1.3.12.2!3i3 ha3 allawad tha appligatian fa: cmduaiing iha DNA ieg'i Hnwewg, éim aggagcatien far framing Df chal'gas hag nut bean acaepien and the samn was {eg'estei 3.

it i3 his intiggment dntnrj 31.12.2§13 whiél nan bean *saila _ ¢-., the peiiiicmer in §he inStant criminai inViSinn. ,

4.

{in due cansidaaiinn of the faet, it is faund that ii'sa mutt M3 mn$§deigd thg dgfenaa of the appliaant almv'éng iha apgiicaiian £Iad by the agpliaant far gnndugting tha DNA Est m aacartain the patemity G? thg ghild barn tn the victim pwsewhix Huwaven tha mun diii not iind it ta be £1 that gniy bawiisa tha §pp3icaticm far ENAtegt has haea ailawaté wwm rmt mean that the prucaeding bafure the Caurt bgiow sh9u§d be stayed.

s h f If it ail te repart a? ENA test ie receixred in ewer Gf'the agpiicent, the a r applicant weuid have liberty 9f using the same befere he eepmerrete {mum at aeprepriate h'm and it seems, it is for this reasen that the court e i beiew, in egite ef aiewing the ENAteet; hee net canetdeted; the requeet at the aepttcaet {m deterring at framin ef themes. Meeétes ta erjd at thte g iuecture that if it ail if the repert 6f QNA teat ia in {event at the epptieeht; g re quaa th he has tn egtten. tn initiate apreertete geeding fer hittg et e entire eriminat preceeding.

5.

Fer the feregoing reeeene:

in the epinien at this Couttgthe mutt heinw has not cammitted any erm.' at iew while passing the Empughert arder ceiling for any interference at thi stage inyoking the tevietehei s power of thie court.

5.

in View of the ebeve, the ineteht timtnai reeieiort ts tiiemieseti e b eing devoio of merit.

SdlP. Sam Koshy Judge