High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/951/2021disposed off

Dilip Kumar Koshle v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-09-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 951 of 2021 • Dilip Kumar Koshle S/o. Shri Jagannath Prasad Koshley Aged About 48 Years Caste Satnami, R/o. Bhojpuri, Police Station Hirri, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Basantpur, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

2. Mahindra And Mahindra Finance Service Limited 3rd Floor, Clc Plaza, Mangla Chowk, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Rakesh Kumar Nagwani S/o. Shri Jaganmal Nagwani Aged About 35 Years R/o. Mother Teresa Nagar, Bhilai Power House, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 2nd Address - Near Anmol Supermarket, Mahveer Nagar, Raipur, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Lavkush Kumar Sahu, Advocates For State : Shri G.I. Sharna, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 16.09.2021

1. The petitioner has filed the present criminal miscellaneous petition for direction to the revisional Court i.e. 1st Additional Sessions Judge Rajnandgaon to decide the Revision Petition No. 14/2021 (Dilip Kumar Koshle vs. State of C.G.) within stipulated time.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has filed application for release of vehicle No. CG 10 H 0011 on Supurdnama before the learned Magistrate which was rejected by the learned Magistrate vide order dated 01.02.2021. Being aggrieved with the aforesaid order he preferred revision petition before the Session Court, Rajnandgoan which is still pending. He would seek direction of this Court to the Sessions Court to decide the revision expeditiously.

3. The prayer seems to be just and proper.

4. Considering the fact that case relates to Supurdnama of the vehicle, it is directed that the Revisional Court shall decide the revision petition within three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of case. Learned Revisional Court is directed to decide the matter on its own merits without being influenced by any of the observations made by this Court while deciding this criminal miscellaneous petition.

5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed off. Sd- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge kishore