High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5692/2019disposed off

Ritesh Kumar Netam v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5692 of 2019 Ritesh Kumar Netam S/o Mr. Shyam Singh Netam Aged About 39 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. Primary School PV67, Block Koylibeda, District U.B. Kanker Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, District Kanker Chhattisgarh

4. Block Development Education Officer Block Kanker, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

---Respondent For Petitioner :

Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent NO. 1,2 &4 :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05/08/2019

1. The grievance of the Petitioner is the inaction on the part of the Respondents in not absorbing the service of the Petitioner into the Education Department as per circular dated 30.06.2018. According to the Petitioner, he has been appointed on 21.06.2010 as such he completed eight years of continuous service on 20.06.2018 that is before the State Government took a decision on 30.06.2018 as such there is no reason why the Petitioner should be left from absorption.

2. Given the limited contention of the Petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the petition pending rather ends of justice would meet if the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No. 2 & 3 to take

an appropriate decision so far as absorption of the Petitioner into the Education Department is concerned at the earliest within a period of 60 days.

3. The Respondents No. 2 & 3 shall be at liberty to take a decision in accordance within the policy of the State Government governing the field of absorption.

4. The Writ Petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha