Suklal v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4986 of 2021 Suklal S/o Shri Sukdev, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village And PostJilga, Tahsil And District- Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Rural Industries, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Director, Directorate Of Rural Industries, Chhattisgarh (Sericulture Section), Indrawati Bhawan, 4th Floor, Block-A, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Joint Director, Sericulture Department, Sonakhan Bhawan, Ring Road, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. Collector Korba, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh
5. Assistant Director, Sericulture Department, Korba, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Akhilesh Kumar under instruction of Mr.
Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For State :
Ms. Sunita Jain, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 17.09.2021
1. The limited grievance of petitioner in the present writ petition is for grant of time bound pay scale on completion of 10 years of regular service on a particular pay scale.
2. The contention of petitioner is that he was appointed as a daily wage employee and working as a daily wage employee for a considerable
period of time the petitioner was regularized in service on 27.09.2008 and since then it is almost 13 years of continuous service that the petitioner has put in. The further contention of the petitioner is that in terms of the circular of the State Govt. so far as grant of time bound pay scale is concerned, since the petitioner has put in more than 10 years of service, he is entitled for the time bound pay scale which in spite of making representation to the authorities till date has not been considered.
3. Given the limited grievance that the petitioner has, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the petitioner to make a fresh representation supported with all relevant documents in support of his claim to the respondents 2, 3 & 5 who in turn shall consider the representation of petitioner on its own merits after due verification of the entitlement of petitioner so far as his claim for time bound pay scale is concerned in terms of the circulars governing the field at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of fresh representation of the petitioner.
4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai