Purushottam Jain v. The State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No. 1012 of 2015 • Purushottam Jain S/o . Shri Bhagbali Ram Jain Aged About 55 Years Occupation- Service Posted As Mali Gardner, R/o. Village Nara, Block- Kanker, Thana And Tahsil- Kanker, Civil And Revenue District- North Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Social Welfare Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex New Raipur, Distt.- Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector And District Programm Co-Coordinator (MGNREGA) Kanker, Distt.- North Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh

3. Assistant Director Garden, Distt.- North Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh

4. Ombudsman, Mahatma Gandhi Rashtriya Gramin Rojgar Gurarantee Yojana MGNREGA Room No. 21 First Flour, District Panchayat Kanker Distt.- Kanker Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer District Panchayat Kanker, Distt. - North Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh

6. Rajesh Sinha, Local Auditor Baster Time, Gaurav Path Road, Subhash Ward Kaner, Distt.- North Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh

7. Madhusudan Jain R/o. Village Hatkongra, Janpad Panchayat Kanker, Distt.- North Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents 01/07/2021 Shri Sunil Sahu, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Ashish Tiwari, GA for the State.

The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even in the second call none appears nor any representation is made on

behalf of the petitioner.

Under the circumstances, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge ashu