Smt. Parmila Bai Shikari v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC NO. 2486 OF 2020 Smt. Pramila Bai Shikari, W/o Shri Mahendra Kumar Shikari, aged about 20 years, R/o Village Chorhadeori, Post Khairadangania, Police Station Ratanpur, Janpad Panchayat Bilha, Tahsil Bilaspur, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur ...

Petitioner(s) versus 1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (CG) 2.

Collector, Bilaspur, Civil & Revenue District, Bilaspur (CG) 3.

Sub Divisional Officer (Revnue), Bilaspur/Prescribed Authority, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (CG) 4.

Tahsildar/Returning Officer (Panchayat Election), Bilha, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (CG) 5.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpand Panchayat, Bilha, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (CG) 6.

Presiding Officer, Polling Booth No.80, Janpad Panchayat Bilha, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (CG) 7.

Presiding Officer, Polling Booth No.81, Janpad Panchayat Bilha, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (CG) 8.

Smt. Anjali Yadav, W/o Shri Krishna Kumar Yadav, aged about 26 years 9.

Smt. Priyanka Shikari, W/o Shri Rishi Shikari, aged about 31 years 10.

Manoj Kumar Shikari, aged about 25 years 11.

Smt. Savitri Bai Gond, W/o Shri Budhwar Gond, aged about 31 years 12.

Smt. Surekha Patel, W/o Shri Manoj Patel, aged about 27 years Respondents No. 8 to 12 all are R/o Village Chorhadeori, Post Khairadangania, Police Station Ratanpur, Janpad Panchayat Bilha, Tahsil Bilaspur, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (CG) ... Respondent(s) _______________________________________________________________ For Petitioner :

Mr. Ramesh Nayak, Advocate.

For Respondents :

Mr. Sudeep Verma, Dy. A.G.

_______________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 29.10.2020 1.

The limited relief that the Petitioner has sought for in the present writ petition is for an appropriate direction to Respondent No.3 for an expeditious decision on the Election Petition No.03/A-89 A 21/2019-20 filed by the Petitioner. 2.

The limited relief sought for by the Petitioner is not opposed by the learned State Counsel.

3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Respondent No.3 to consider and decide the aforementioned Election Petition, in accordance with law, at

the earliest, preferably within a period of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4.

Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) /sharad/ Judge