← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2167/2018dismissed

Sudhir Singh v. Union Of India

2020-03-05Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 2167 of 2018 • Sudhir Singh, aged about 40 years, S/o M.B. Singh, R/o Imlipara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Government of India, New Delhi.

2. State of Chhattisgarh through Transport Commissioner, Department of Transport, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (C.G.)

3. Registering Authority/Regional Transport Officer, Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

None.

For Respondent/State :

Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Deputy Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board Per P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice 05.03.2020 1.

The Petitioner has moved this Court with the following prayers: "10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ quashing the amended provision made under the rule 32 & 81 of the Central Motor Vehicles 1989 vide notification dated 29.12.2016 imposing penalty clause and may be declared void.

10.2 That, during pendency of petition the respondent no. 3 may be directed not to take penalty from the petitioner as per endorsement made on 25.07.2018.

10.3 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstances of the case may also be awarded to the petitioner including the cost and expenses of this petition. An affidavit in support of this petition is filed herewith."

2.

When the matter was taken up for consideration on 04.03.2020 there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner, yet we decided to grant one more chance and have listed the matter accordingly. 3.

Same as the position today as well. There is nobody to represent the Petitioner. It appears that the Petitioner has lost interest in the cause of action. 4.

The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (P. R. Ramachandra Menon) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Brijmohan