← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4345/2020disposed off

Nand Lal Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-11-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

-1HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4345 of 2020 Nand Lal Thakur, S/o. Late Shri Tulsi Ram Thakur, Aged About 62 Years, Working As Assistant Draftsman In The Office Of Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Durg Division, Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Engineer In Chief, Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, (B & R) Durg Circle, Durg, Chhattisgarh.

4. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (B & R) Durg Division, Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

5. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (B & R) Bemetara Division, Bemetara District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Anand Dadariya, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Amrito Das, Addl. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

ORDER

05.11.2020

1. Grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner was initially appointed as Tracer in the year 1980, subsequently he was promoted in 1998 to the post of Assistant Draftsman. The petitioner though has rendered considerable period of service and according to the different circulars and scheme of the State, the petitioner was entitled for time pay-scale, however, the same has not been granted to him. Therefore, the petitioner has submitted the necessary representation.

-22. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is retiring this month, therefore, his claim to get the time bound payscale up-till 3rd time pay scale may be considered.

3. Perusal of Annexure P-10 would show that the representation has already been filed by the petitioner and limited prayer has been made that the petitioner's representation may be decided. Therefore, without any observation on merit, the respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.09.2020 (Annexure P-10) within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Aks