High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6182/2016disposed off

K.B.Mishra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-01-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6182 of 2016 K.B.Mishra S/o Late Shri Ramlakhan Mishra, Aged About 55 Years Posted As Salesman, Amapara Gondwn, Amapara, Raipur, Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Thorugh The Chief Secretary, Gramodhyog Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Tahsil And Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies Raipur, Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. The Director, Gramodhyog Department, Sonakhan, Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. The Managing Director, Chhatttisgarh State Handloom Development, And Marketin Cooperative Federation Limited, B 26, Sector 7, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh

5. The Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Handloom Development, And Marketing Cooperative Federation Limited, B 26, Sector 7, New Raiendra Nagar, Raipur, Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh

6. M.M. Joshi Posted As Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Handloom Development & Marketing Cooperative Federation Limited, B 26, Sector 7, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Devershi Thakur, Advocate. For Respondent No. 1/State : Shri Avinash Singh, PL for the State. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 30/01/2017

(1) Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been subjected to show cause by respondent No. 4- Managing Director of the Board, against which he has filed reply but the same has not been considered and decided till now and, therefore, a direction may be issued to respondent No. 4 to take a decision on the reply to show cause filed by petitioner expedetiously. To

which, counsel for the State has no objection.

(2) Be that as it may, the respondent No. 4- The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Handloom Development and Marketing Cooperative Federation Limited is directed to take decision on the petitioner's reply within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order strictly in accordance with law.

(3) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-