High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2134/2018disposed off

Rasulan Bibi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-09-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2134 of 2018 • Rasulan Bibi W/o Gulam Rasul Minya , Caste Musalman, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Ward No. 10 Balrampur Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur, District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. But Wrongly Mention In The Order As R/o VillageMeral Post, Police Station Meral District- Garhwa, Jharkhand...... (Respondent No.1) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secratary, Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector Balrampur District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj (CG)

3. Sub-Divisional OfÏcer (Revenue) Ramajunganj, DistrictBalrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

4. Tashildar Balrampur DistrictBalrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Municipal OfÏcer Nagar Palika Parishad, Balrampur, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh

6. Smt. Manhgi Devi W/o Ramjeet Caste- Korwa, R/o Balrampur, Police Station And Tahsil Balrampur, District- Balrampur, -Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh

7. Gulam Rasul Miyan S/o Lal Mohamad Miyan Cast- Musalman, R/o Village Balrampur Tahsil- Balrampur District- BalrampurRamanujganj, Chhattisgarh, But Wrongly Mention In The Order As R/o Village- Meral Post And Police Station Meral DistrictGarhwa, Jharkhand.......(Respondent No.2) ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. AN Pandey, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Sameer Behar, Panel Lawyer Order On Board By Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

10/9/2018

1. Heard.

2. The order under challenge is an interim order passed by respondent No.2-Collector, Balrampur, in an appeal preferred by respondent No.6 Smt. Manhgi Devi.

3. The petitioner has an option of moving an application for vacating stay before the Collector or to prefer an appeal/revision before the Commissioner under Section 44 of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959. The petitioner instead of availing any of the option has straightway rushed to this Court.

4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already appeared before the Collector.

5. If that be so, the petitioner may move fresh application for vacating stay, which shall be considered by the Collector in accordance with law at the earliest.

6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Shyna