Smt. Asha Acharya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 5006 OF 2018 Smt. Asha Acharya W/o Shri Vinod Acharya Aged About 59 Years Occupation Assistant Grade- Ill, Social Forestry, Forest Division Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh. R/o Motilal Nehru Ward Nayapara, Police Station City Kotwali, Post And Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Forest Department Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Deputy Secretary, Forest Department Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest, Chhattisgarh, Arnya Bhawan, Medical College Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Conservator Of Forest, Jagdalpur Circle, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

5. Divisional Forest Officer, Office Of The Divisional Forest Office Research And Expansion Centre, Social Forestry Division, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Shri Ashok Shukla, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri Mazid Ali, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 07.08.2018 1.

The limited grievance which the petitioner makes is for a direction to the respondents to decide the representation which the petitioner has made to the department and the correspondences made by immediate superior of the petitioner to the higher authorities which is still pending consideration before them.

2.

Given the aforesaid request made by the petitioner, the present writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 to take a decision on the correspondence made by the Principal Chief

Conservator of Forest on 08.09.2011 as also letter of the Divisional Forest Officer dated 04.04.2011 seeking instructions/guidelines so far as the request for change of date of birth of the petitioner is concerned.

3.

Let the respondent No.1 take a decision on this as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

4.

It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion so far as merits of the case is concerned. The respondents shall decide the request of the petitioner purely in accordance with rules and law governing the filed.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy Judge inder