← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2772/2016disposed off

Tiranga Mahila Swa -Sahayata Samuh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-11-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2772 of 2016 • Tiranga Mahila Swa -Sahayata Samuh, Village Dhanigaon, Block Baramkela, Sector-Jognipali, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh Through Its President Smt. Ratna Bariha, W/o Shri Chandu Bariha Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Dhanigaon, Block Baramkela, Sector- Jognipali, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Women & Children Development Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director (Women & Children Development Department) Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Collector (Women & Children Development Department) Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4. The Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project, Lendra, Block Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5. District Programme Officer, (Women & Children Development Department), Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri P. K. Patel, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Dy. GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 17/11/2016 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Collector, Raigarh has passed the impugned order, therefore, the petitioner does not have any alternative remedy except to prefer this writ petition because under the extant government guidelines,

the appeal lies before the Collector.

2.

Considering the entire facts situation of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with direction that if the petitioner prefers an appeal/representation before the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, Government of Chhattisgarh, within a period of two weeks from today, the said Principal Secretary shall consider and decide petitioner's appeal/representation at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of submission. The appeal shall be decided after providing personal hearing to the petitioner.

Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala