High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4947/2018disposed off

Smt. Deepika Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-08-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4947 of 2018 Smt. Deepika Verma W/o W/o Bhojraj Verma Aged About 29 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Govt. Higher Secondary, School, Chetba, Block Kansable, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate For State : Mr. R.K. Gupta, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 02.08.2018

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking the relief to direct the respondent authorities to consider her case for regularization.

3. The petitioner is working as Lecturer (Panchayat) and posted at Government Higher Secondary School, Chetba, Block Kansabel, District Jashpur.

4. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to file the representation before respondent No.2 for redressal of her grievances and instant writ petition may be

disposed of with the direction that the respondent No.2 shall decide such representation within a stipulated time.

5. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by the counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of with this direction that the petitioner may file representation before the respondent No.2 for redressal of her grievances within 10 days from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner before the respondent No.2, in that event respondent No.2 shall decide such representation expeditiously preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law and procedure.

6. It is made clear that this Court has not touched the merits of the case.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE L/-