High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5325/2021disposed off

Jeetram Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-10-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5325 of 2021 Jeetram Yadav S/o Shri Muritram Yadav, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village And Post Lakhali, Tahsil Champa, Police Station Sarangaon, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Engineer In Chief, Department Of Water Resources, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Bango Project, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Executive Engineer, Minimata Bango Canal Division, Nandeli Bhata, Sakti, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate For State :

Mr. Neeraj Pradhan, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 04.10.2021

1. The limited relief sought by the petitioner in the present writ petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondents for considering his claim for regularization.

2. According to petitioner, he was initially engaged by the respondents way back in the year 1989 and since then the petitioner has been continuously working with the respondents uninterruptedly. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he is entitled to be considered for regularization in terms of the circular of the State Government dealing

with the regularization dated 05.03.2008 and also in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others Vs. Uma Devi (3) and others, 2006 (4) SCC 1.

3. Having head the contentions put forth by the counsel for petitioner, the present writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of. It is directed that subject to verification of entitlement of petitioner in accordance with the circulars governing the field of regularization, the claim of petitioner to be scrutinized and processed for regularization at the earliest preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai