Mukesh Kumar Tandon v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 120 of 2017 • Mukesh Kumar Tandon S/o Puniram Tandon, Aged About 21 Years R/o Gopiyapara, Masturi, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Of Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Chitrarekha Ratre D/o Arjun Lal Ratre, Aged About 19 Years R/o Gopiyapara, Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Majid Ali, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 9/2/2017

1. Heard.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the express provisions contained under Section 320(2) of Cr.P.C., wherein, only specified offences can be compounded and no other ones and as also in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the matter of State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Madanlal, (2015) 7 SCC 681, no case for quashing the charges or permitting compounding of the offence is made out as the petitioner is facing charges under Section 354 of IPC.

3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna