Dibya Priti Tirkey (Wrongly Mentioned Vidhya In Order Dated 03.08.17) v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5166 of 2021

1. Dibya Priti Tirkey (Wrongly Mentioned Vidhya In Order Dated 03.08.17) W/o Shri Vinay Tirkey Aged About 33 Years Hostel Superintendent At 100 Seater Girls Hostel, Podi- Bachera, P.S. And Block - Khadgava, District - Korea (Chhattisgarh)

2. Smt. Sakunti Yadav W/o Shri Kailash Chandra Aged About 50 Years Cook At 100 Seater Girls Hostel, Podi - Bachra, P.S. And Block- Khadgava, District - Korea (Chhattisgarh)

3. Smt. Prabhavati W/o Shri Kailash Aged About 52 Years Chowkidar At Girls Hostel Superintendent At 100 Seater Girls Hostel, Podi - Bachra, P.S. And Block - Khadgava, District - Korea (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Managing Director Holistic Education State Project Office, 2nd Floor, Unified Educational Building, Pension Bada, Raipur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Collector / District Mission Director Of Holistic Education Baikunthpur, District- Korea (Chhatisgarh)

5. The District Education Officer / District Project Officer Holistic Education, Baikunthpur, District- Korea (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. A. S. Rajput, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Ishan Verma, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 30.09.2021

1. The counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that he be permitted to make a representation to the respondent no.2 to 5 ventilating petitioners grievances which arises on account of decision

of the respondents in merging the 100 Seater Girls Hostel into Kasturba Gandhi Girls Residential School.

2. The limited relief is not opposed.

3. Counsel for the State however submits that as regards the petitioner no.1 is concerned, she is otherwise substantive post holder i.e. lecturer under the respondents and so far as petitioner no.2 to 5 are concerned, they were temporary employees engaged at 100 Seater Girls Hostel.

4. Given the said relief that petitioners seek for, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the petitioners, if they so want, prefer a representation within a period of 10 days to respondent no.2 to 5 and respondent no.2 to 5 in turn are directed to decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law in terms of the policy governing the field.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit