Smt. Kavita Rathore v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6282 of 2016 Smt. Kavita Rathore S/o Shri Arun Kumar Rathore, Aged About 32 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Govt. Primary School, Gopimahaka, R/o Village Gopimahaka, Thana Kharshiya, Tah Kharshiya, District Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat, Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Director, Panchayat, Sanchanalaya, Chhattisgarh Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Raigarh, District Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kharsiya, District Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh)

6. District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Smt. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board By 17/11/2016 Heard on admission.

(1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) since last many years, neither she has been given Kramonnati nor she has been given Samayman Vetanman (time bound pay scale) and therefore, she may

be permitted to file representation before the competent authority for redressal of her grievances. To which, counsel for the State has no objection.

(2) Prayer appears to fair and reasonable.

(3) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. In the eventuality of making any representation by the petitioner highlighting her grievances, the same is expected to be decided by the authority concerned expeditiously in accordance with law.

(4) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation in accordance with law.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-