Smt. Arti Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4366 of 2020 • Smt. Arti Sharma, W/o. Amit Kumar Sharma Aged About 37 Years Working As Lecturer (Nagariya Nikay) At Mahatma Gandhi Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Thankhamaria, Block Saja, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Director, Directorate Of Urban Administration Development, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Panchayat Thankhamaria, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh)

4. District Education Officer, Bemetara, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 05.11.2020 Heard

1. The limited grievance which the petitioner has raised in this writ petition is that by virtue of order passed in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) decided on 26.11.2017 the petitioner has been granted the benefit of revised pay scale on completion of 8 years of service.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance which now remains is that the benefit is being provided to the petitioner prospectively and though the respondents have made a calculation which the petitioner is entitled from the date of his completion of 8 years but no effective orders

have been passed nor have department taken any steps for release of the arrears of payment. The petitioner prays for appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the said amount. According to the petitioner he had completed his 8 years of service on 16.06.2013 and accordingly he is entitled for the benefit of revised pay scale immediately on completion of 8 years of service. However, the benefit has been extended to the petitioner only from the year 2019. Thus the present writ petition has been filed seeking for direction to respondents to consider the claim of the arrears of benefit between 2013 to 2019.

3. Without entering into the merits of the case and taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Mukesh Patel (supra) which has also been affirmed by the Division Bench and taking note of the fact that the respondents have complied with the order to the extent of granting revised pay scale to the petitioner, let respondents No. 2 to 4 take an appropriate decision at the earliest so far as release of the arrears of payment which the petitioner is entitled for. Expecting a decision from the respondents within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti