Sanjay Singh Rajput v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.6346 of 2016 1.
Sanjay Singh Rajput S/o N. S. Rajput, Aged About 42 Years Working As Shiksha Karmi Grade- Il (Teacher Panchayat) Govt. Middle School Jangalpur, Block Chhuikhadan, R/o Village Bagur, Post And P. S. Gandai, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) 2.
Kaushal Kumar Shrivastava S/o Gorelal Shrivastava, Aged About 46 Years Working As Shiksha Karmi Grade- Ill (Assistant Teacher Panchayat) At Primary School Thathar, Block Chhuikhadan, R/o Village Gokna, Post And P. S. Gandai, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners
Versus
1.
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat & Rural Development, Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2.
The Director, Department Of Panchayat & Rural Development, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3.
Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) 4.
The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Anshul R. Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Shri Prasun Bhaduri, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 22/11/2016
(1) The petitioners who are working on the post of Siksha Karmi Grade-I/II/III, through this petition are claiming the benefits at par with the regular employees of the Panchayat Department. 2.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that a similar issue in this regard has already come up before the Division Bench of this Court in a bunch of Writ Appeals, the leading appeal being W.A. No.321/2011 decided on 15.09.2014. According to the counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition can also be disposed of in terms of the directions given by the Division Bench on 15.09.2014. He further submits that the co-ordinate Bench of this Court also in W.P.(S) No. 6651/2014 vide its order dated 22.12.2014, had disposed of the writ petition in the light of the decision of the Division Bench dated 15.09.2014.
3.
State counsel also agrees for the case of the petitioners to be disposed of in terms of the order passed by the Division Bench as well as the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench referred to above. 4.
Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioners may file a representation before the concerned respondent/Authorities within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy. The petitioners shall also file the certified copy of the above referred two orders before the concerned Authority. On such representation being submitted, the Authorities concerned shall decided the claim of the petitioners in terms of the order passed by the Division of this Court in W.A. No.321/2011 dated 15.09.2014 and the order dated 22.12.2014 passed in W.P.(S) No.6651/2014, objectively. The Authorities should decide the same as
expeditiously as possible within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation.
5.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-