Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Mahavidyalayin Pensioners Sangh v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.5333 of 2012 Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Mahavidyalayin Pensioners Sangh, a registered Society duly registered by Registrar of Societies, Chhattisgarh, bearing Registration No.3011, having its office at Flat N.1/G, Nathani Apartments, New Shanti Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Through its Secretary Shri Vijay Chakravarty, S/o Late Suresh Chandra Chakravarty, aged about 77 years, R/o Flat No.1/G, Nathani Apartments, New Shanti Nagar, Raipur 492 007 (C.G.) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.)
2. The Principal Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Finance Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.)
3. The Principal Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Higher Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.)
4. Directorate of Treasury, Accounts & Pensions, through the Commissioner, Treasury, Accounts & Pensions, Canal Road, Civil Lines, Anand Nagar, Raipur (C.G.)
5. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through the Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner:
Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate.
For Respondents No.1 to 4 / State of Chhattisgarh: - Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 25/01/2018
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the subject matter in dispute, the petitioner's two representations dated 25-6-2012 and 31-7-2012 are pending consideration before the State Government and the State Government has not taken any decision on the same.
2. Be that as it may, the State Government is directed to take decision on the petitioner's representations expeditiously, preferably within period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, keeping in view that the petitioner Association is representing the case of pensioners who had already retired from service. The petitioner Association is at liberty to file additional representation along with the relevant judgments in support of its case.
3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma