Jitendra Siingh Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5102 of 2018 Jitendra Siingh Thakur S/o Late Shri Ratan Singh Thakur , Aged About 53 Years Accountant At Governor Secretariat Civil Line, Raipur Police Station Civil Line, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Tribal Welfare New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner, Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development Department, Block- D, Ground Floor, Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. A.S. Rajput, Advocate For State :

Mr. S.P. Kale, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 21/08/2018

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that though the petitioner is substantively an employee of the Tribal Welfare Department where he was initially appointed in the year 1990, his seniority in the parent department is not being maintained only because the services of the petitioner has been placed on deputation in the Secretariat of His Excellency the Governor of the State of Chhattisgarh.

2. The counsel for the petitioner submits that in the event if his lien is maintained in his parent department, the petitioner is entitled for the regular promotion that he would be entitled for in the department and atleast his case should be considered by the respondents in this regard.

3. According to the petitioner, the Assistant Commissioner in the department has also recommended the case of the petitioner.

4. Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, let the respondent No.1 on a representation being made by the petitioner within a period of 15 days from today take a decision in this regard and issue appropriate instructions to the respondent No.2 deciding whether the petitioner has to be treated as an employee of the Tribal Welfare Department or has to be treated as an employee of the Governor.

5. In case, if the petitioner is found to be an employee of the Tribal Welfare Department, then the petitioner's case for promotion in accordance to his seniority has to be considered.

6. Let this exercise be done within a period of 60 days from today.

7. It is expected that the respondent authorities would decide the case of the petitioner at the earliest keeping in view the fact that there is a likelihood of a D.P.C. to be held very soon. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved