High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4975/2018disposed off

Smt. Amita Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-08-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4975 of 2018 Smt. Amita Soni W/o Shri Rajesh Kumar Soni Aged About 31 Years Occupation Service Teacher (Municipal) At Municipal Council Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, R/o Ward No. 9, Dewangan Para, Takhatpur. P. S. And Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Before Marriage The Name Of Petitioner Was Amita Verma, But After Marriage On 04-12-2011, The Petitioner Has Added The Surname Of Her Husband)., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh . ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Municipal Council Takhatpur, Through The Chief Municipal Officer, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5. Joint Director, Urban Administration And Development Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

6. Municipal Council Kondagaon, Through The Chief Municipal Officer, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For the Petitioner :

Shri Rishi Sahu, Advocate For the State/res. No.1,2,4 & 5 :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /08/2018

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking relief to direct the respondent-authority to decide her representation Annexure-P/4.

3. Petitioner is a Teacher (Municipal) posted at Municipal Council, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur.

4. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that this petition may be disposed of directing the respondent No. 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner Annexure P/4 dated 01/02/2018 within stipulated time.

5. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of with this direction that the respondent No. 3 shall decide the aforesaid representation Annexure P/4 dated 01/02/2018 expeditiously and preferably within 90 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order according to law and procedure. This Court has not touched the merits of the case. Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde