Bhimjee Gohil v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

Writ Appeal No.

^ 12015 Li ...

Bhimjee Gohil S/o Late,^3ohil aged about years, Occupation-Assistant Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Sub Division: Dabhra, Distt:

Bilaspur (C.G.) APPELLANT ftffU cftHI ^s^-'''

i^sy'

^-^

VERSUS

Qd-S*-'"

RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department Public Health and Engineering Vallabh Bhawan, Shopal (M.P.) (Now in Chattisgarh) 2) The Engineer-in-Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Satpura Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) (Now in Chattisgarh).

3y ^, ' tfs.^.yi \ ' fesra%3-'?-5 ' ^. B The Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Raipur (M.P.) (Now in Chattisgarh) APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT APREAL TO DIVISION BENCH ACT, 2006 READ WITH RULE 156 (10) OF THE HIGH C6URT OF CHHATISGARH RULES 2007

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR DB: HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA. ACTING C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI P. SAM KOSHY. J.

WritAppealNo.4/2015 Bhimjee Gohil APPELLANT Petitioner

Versus

RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others (WRIT€Pt®l-WNDERSECTION 2 QFfflE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH), ACT 2006) 'Appearance:

- ;

Shri Rajesh Roshan Singh, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri R.K. Gupta, Dy.Advocate General for the State.

ORDER

(19.01.2015) NAVIN SINHA, ACTING G.-) 1.

We have heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant and the State. 2.

On facts of the case we firid no reason to take any different view from that taken by the Learned Single Judge that the application has become infructuous.

3.

The appeal is disposed in the aforesaid terms. Sd/- ActingChiefJustice Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Slinita