Nripendra Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5365 of 2019

1. Nripendra Singh S/o Shri Shiv Mangal Singh Aged About 25 Years R/o Mpeb, Near D.P.S. School, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Aarti Pandey D/o Shri Ashok Kumar Pandey Aged About 26 Years R/o 16/a, Gitanjali City, Phase-I, Bahtarai Road, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Pankaj Dewangan S/o Shri Manharan Dewangan Aged About 24 Years R/o Beside Budha Dev Mandi Street, Gaytrinagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Vikas Singh Rajput S/o Shri Gokaran Singh Rajput Aged About 27 Years R/o Village- Bhilai Bazar, Tahsil- Katghora, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Chhattisgarh Government, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chairperson Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board(C.G.Vyapam), Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioners :

Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate For State :

Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.3 :

Dr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 23/07/2019 1.

The limited prayer that the petitioners have made in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation that the petitioners have made, so far as their claim for the post of Accountants in the different Nagar Palika and Nagar Panchayat in the State of Chhattisgarh.

-22.

To the limited prayer that the petitioners have made, there is no opposition by the respondents.

3.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to take a decision on Annexure P/1, the representations that the petitioners have made at the earliest preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

4.

It shall be the responsibility of the petitioners to apprise the respondent No.2, so far as the order passed by this Court is concerned. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, so far as the entitlement of the petitioner is concerned. 5.

With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved