Smt. Mithilesh Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5404 of 2018 Smt. Mithilesh Pandey W/o Late Shri Madan Gopal Pandey, Aged About 60 Years, Occupation Assistant- Teacher Nagriya Nikay Govt. Town Prathmik Shala Champa, R/o Gram Champa, Thana Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sachiv, Nagriya Prashashan Avm Vikash Vibhag Mantralay, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Sanchalnalay Nagriya Prashashan Avm Vikash Chhattisgarh Raipur

3. Commissioner, Sanchalnalay Nagriya Prashashan Avm Vikash Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Mukhya Nagar Palika Adhikari, Nagar Palika Parishad Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer, Bamhnideeh District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For petitioner :

Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 23/08/2018 1.

The grievance of the petitioner in the instant Writ Petition is that, though she was entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati as well as other benefits on having put requisite length of service with the respondents, the same has not been given to the petitioner.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that, initially, it was granted to the petitioner, but subsequently, it was withdrawn without any reasons assigned.

He further submits that, there are other benefits also which had not been granted to the petitioner. He further submits that, the petitioner has already made a representation to the respondent No.4 in this regard which is pending consideration and thus he seeks for direction to the respondent No.4 to decide the same at the earliest.

3.

The said prayer is not opposed by the State counsel. 4.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed off with a direction to the respondent No.4 to consider and decide the representation which the petitioner has filed at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from today. In addition, the petitioner would also be entitled for making a fresh representation.

5.

The Writ Petition accordingly stands allowed and disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Bhola