Mohd. Ikbal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 133 of 2017

1. Mohd. Ikbal S/o Mohd. Israil, Aged About 45 Years Assistant Grade III, R/o House No. 89, Sadar Bazar, Gore Wala Teke Road, Police Station-Sadar Bazar, Nagpur, Tahsil And District-Nagpur (Maharastra) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through-The Anti Corruption Bureau, Raipur, DistrictRaipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri Vivek Singhal, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Syed Majid Ali, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 01/02/2017 1.

At the very outset, it is informed that accused statement has already been recorded, therefore, no interference can be made with the impugned order by which opportunity to cross-examine the witness has been denied to the petitioner.

2.

As an upshot, the petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is liable to be and is hereby dismissed.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri