Lilesh Kumar Choudhary v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.6723 of 2016 Lilesh Kumar Choudhary S/o Shri Ravindra Nath Choudhary, Aged About 30 Years R/o Bhuthadahra, Post Badesajapali, Thana & Tahsil Basna, Civil & Revenue District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Urban Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. The Director, Urban Administration And Development Department R.D.A. Building, First Floor, Shastri Chowk Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. Collector, Balodabajar, Distirct Balodabajar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh
4. Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate For State :
Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 09/12/2016 (1) Heard.
(2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's brother died in harness on 24.11.2012 while working as Assistant Teacher (Shiksha Karmi Grade-III). The petitioner has made an application for appointment on compassionate ground which is pending consideration before the competent authority and as the same has not been considered and decided till this date in accordance with law by the competent authority and, therefore, a direction may be
issued to the competent authority to decide the same expeditiously. (3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.
(4) Be that as it may, the competent authorities are directed to consider and pass an appropriate orders on application of the petitioner for compassionate appointment in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(5) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(6) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned is free to decide the application of the petitioner in accordance with law. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-