High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6795/2016disposed off

Heera Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-12-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP (S) No.6795 of 2016 Heera Singh, S/o Shri Rudra Prasad, aged about 26 years, R/o Village Kuppi, P.O. Baijnathpur, P.S. Odgi, District Surajpur (CG) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (CG)

2. The Commissioner, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Development, Raipur (CG)

3. The Collector, District Surajpur (CG) (Tribal Development)

4. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Surajpur, District Surajpur (CG)

5. The Block Education Officer, Odgi, District Surajpur (CG) ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr.Atanu Ghosh, Advocate For respondents/State : Mr.P.K. Bhaduri, G.A., on advance copy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice C.B.Bajpai Order on Board /12/2016

1. Heard.

2. Issue notice.

3. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Hence, the petitioner is not required to pay separate process fees for service to the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated 9.9.2015 passed in WPS No.3981 of 2012 followed in the order passed on 20.6.2016 in WPS Nos.410 of 2016, 14 of 2016, 28 of 2016, 257 of 2016, 835 of 2016, 1032 of 2016, 4513 of 2015, 4266

of 2015, 24 of 2016, 433 of 2016 and 1127 of 2016 is the order passed for similarly situated persons, hence, the aforesaid order passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court is applicable to the present writ petition and accordingly, the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the aforementioned order of this Court.

5. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents/State admitted this fact that aforesaid order is also covered for the instant writ petition.

6. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is disposed of in the light of the order passed in aforementioned case. The authorities are directed to examine the case of the petitioner and pass appropriate order under the authority of law within a maximum period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner may file copy of the order along with copy of order of the instant writ petition and the documents annexed before the authorities for consideration as directed.

7. If the petitioner's grievance is not redressed/fully redressed, he will be at liberty to revive his petition.

Sd/- (C.B.Bajpai) Judge B/-