Mukesh Porte v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 900 of 2017 • Mukesh Porte, aged about 25 years, son of Shri Kaliram Porte, r/o. Daarsagar, Chowki Belgahna, PS Kota, Revenue and civil District Bilaspur(CG).

---- Applicant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh Through the Distict Magistrate, District Bilaspur (CG).

---- Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - For Applicant :

Mr. Ritesh Verma,, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Mr. Vivek Singhal, Panel Lawyer.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 23-02-2017 1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested on 17-01-2017 in connection with Crime No. 242 of 2016, registered at Police Station Belgahna, Kota, District Bilaspur (CG), for the offence punishable under Section 34 (2) & 59(A) of the CG Excise Act.

2.

As per prosecution case, on information being received, a raid was conducted by the police party whereby the applicant was found in possession of illicit liquor measuring about 76 liters, the same was seized from him and thereby the aforsaid offence was committed. 3.

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case, seiziure was not made from the applicant, he is in jail since 17-1-2017. He would further submit that the case of the present applicant is similar to that

of other co-accused Pramod Yadav who has been granted bail vide order dated 15-12-2016 passed by co-ordinate Bench of this court in M.Cr.C.No. 7970 of 2016, therefore, present applicant may also be released on bail on the ground of parity.

4.

Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail application, however, he does not dispute the fact that the case of the present applicant is similar to that of other co-accused who has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary and documents.

6.

Taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the fact that the applicant is in jail since 17-1-2017 and further taking note of the fact that other co-accused has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case where the applicant can be released on bail. 7.

Accordingly, the application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnshing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He shall appear before the trial Court as and when directed. Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Raju