A. A. Siddiqui v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2896 of 2016 A.A.Siddiqui S/o Qubool Ahmad, Aged About 61 Years Posted As Sub Engineer, At Rural Engineering Services Sub Division Akaltara District Janjgir Champa R/o Main Road, Talapara, Bilaspur, P. S. Civil Line Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat & Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).
2. Joint Secretary, State Of Chhattisgarh, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Under Secretary, Secretary, State Of Chhattisgarh, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4. The Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh).
5. Superintendent Engineer, Rural Engineering Services, Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
6. The Chief Executive Engineer, Jila Panchayat Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh).
7. The Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Services, Janjgir Division, District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh).
---- Respondents And WPS No. 1412 Of 2015 A. A. Siddiqui S/o Qubool Ahmad Aged About 61 Years Posted As Sub Engineer, At Raural Engineering Services Sub - Division Akaltara District Janjgir Champa R/o Main Road, Talapara, Bilaspur Ps Civil Line Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat & Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisarh
2. The Collector Janjgir Chamap, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
3. The Chief Executive Engineer, Jila Panchayat Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
4. The Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Services, Janjgir Division, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate.
For Respondents/State : Smt. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 29/11/2016 (1) Since both the petitions involved common question of law & facts, they are being disposed of by this common order.
(1) Counsel for the petitioner would submit that he is working on the post of Sub-Engineer in the department of Rural Engineering Services but he has not been paid salary from the period from 1.6.2016 to 1.11.2016 for which he may be permitted to make representation before the Commissioner (Revenue) and same may be directed to be decided expeditiously. (2) Prayer appears to be fair & reasonable.
(3) Be that as it may, if the petitioner prefers representation before the Commissioner (Revenue) for redressal of his grievances within two weeks from today, it is expected to be considered & decided by the authority concerned expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(4) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petitions stand finally disposed of.
(5) This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned is free to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law.
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-