High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5234/2018disposed off

Firan Das Manikpuri v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-08-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 5234 OF 2018

1. Firan Das Manikpuri S/o Chhedudas Manikpuri , Aged About 64 Years Presently R/o Village And Post Pawni ( Bailaigarh) District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector , Balodabazar District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

3. Accountant General, Office Of The Accountant General , Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer, Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

5. District Treasury Officer, Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Shri KP Sahu, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Ms. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer.

For Respondent No.3 :

Shri Ashwani Shukla, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 21.08.2018

1. The limited grievance which the petitioner has raised in this petition is that though he was entitled for a sum of Rs.1,45,738/- towards GPF, he has been paid only Rs.1,00,063/-, thus, there is a dispute of Rs.45,700/-.

2. Considering the limited dispute this court does not intend to keep this petition pending. Rather ends of justice would serve if the present petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.3 & 5 to call upon the petitioner with entire records that are available with him and to scrutinize the GPF accounts of the petitioner and verify various entries of withdrawal that have been made while he was in service and thereafter

take an appropriate decision and if it is found that the petitioner is entitled for certain extra amount, the same be released to him at the earliest and if the petitioner is not entitled, he be intimated accordingly. Let this exercise be done within a period of 90 days from today.

3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy Judge inder