Smt. Shanti Bai Markam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5260 of 2021

1. Smt. Shanti Bai Markam W/o Shri Kanwalsai Aged About 50 Years Hostel Superintendent At 100, Seated Girls Hostel, Aadkachhepdapara, Kondagaon, Block And District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

2. Ranjita Netam D/o Late Shri Malsukhram Aged About 29 Years Cook At Government Girls Hostel, Aadkachhepdapara, Kondagaon, Block And District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

3. Sarita Netam D/o Aayturam Aged About 27 Years Cook At Government Girls Hostel, Aadkachhepdapara, Kondagaon, Block And District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

4. Rameshwari Netam D/o Patiram Aged About 26 Years Cook At Government Girls Hostel, Aadkachhepdapara, Kondagaon, Block And District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

5. Smt. Uma Korram W/o Late Shri Kodaram Aged About 43 Years Chowkidar At Government Girls Hostel, Aadkachhepdapara, Kondagaon, Block And District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. The Managing Director Holistic Education State Project Office, 2nd Floor, Unified Educational Building, Pension Bada, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. The Collector/district Mission Director Of Holistic Education Kondagaon District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

5. The District Education Officer / District Project Officer Holistic Education, Kondagaon District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. A. S. Rajput, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Jitendra pali, Dy. AG with Mr. Ayaz Naved, GA & Mr. Suyash Dhar, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

29.09.2021

1. The counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that he be permitted to make a representation to the respondent no.2 to 5 ventilating their grievances which arises on account of decision of the respondents in merging the 100 Seater Girls Hostel into Kasturba Gandhi Girls Residential School.

2. The limited relief is not opposed.

3. Counsel for the State however submits that as regards the petitioner no.1 is concerned, she is otherwise substantive post holder i.e. lecturer under the respondents and so far as petitioner no.2 to 5 are concerned, they were temporary employees engaged at 100 Seater Girls Hostel.

4. Given the said relief that petitioners seek for, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the petitioners, if they so want, prefer a representation within a period of 10 days to respondent no.2 to 5 and respondent no.2 to 5 in turn are directed to decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law in terms of the policy governing the field.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit