← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/1078/2013disposed off

Vijay Kumar Jain v. The State Of C.G. And ANR.

2019-06-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

Cr.M.P. No.963 of 2013 & other connected matters NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 963 of 2013

1. Vijay Kumar Jain S/o R.B. Jain Aged About 64 Years R/o. A-28 Bajaj Colony, New Rajendra Nagar, P.O. Raavigram P.S.-Rajendra Nagar, Rev. And Civil Distt. Raipur (CG).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The In-Charge P.S. Bodhghat, Jagdalpur, Dist. Bastar, CG Crime No. 453/10 Date 05/12/10

2. The Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co.Ltd. Through The Executive Engineer, Area Stores Division Geedam Road, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar C.G.

---- Respondent CRMP No. 1078 of 2013

1. Vijay Kumar Jain S/o R.B. Jain Aged About 64 Years R/o. A-28 Bajaj Colony, New Rajendra Nagar, P.O. Raavigram P.S.-Rajendra Nagar, Rev. And Civil Distt. Raipur (CG).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The In-Charge P.S. Civil Lines, Bilaspur, CG Crime No. 782/10 Date 21/10/10

2. The Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co.Ltd. Through The Executive Engineer, Area Stores Division Bilaspur C.G. ---- Respondent CRMP No. 1080 of 2013

1. Vijay Kumar Jain S/o R.B. Jain Aged About 64 Years R/o. A-28 Bajaj Colony, New Rajendra Nagar, P.O. Raavigram P.S.-Rajendra Nagar, Rev. And Civil Distt. Raipur (CG).

---- Petitioner

Versus

Cr.M.P. No.963 of 2013 & other connected matters

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The In-Charge P.S. City Kotwali, Raigarh, Cr.No.732/10 dated 21/10/2010.

2. The Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co.Ltd. Through The Executive Engineer, Area Stores Division Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh C.G.

---- Respondent For Petitioner None For Respondent/State Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Govt. Advocate Shri R.K. Bhagat, Dy. Govt. Advocate Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

28/06/2019 1.

At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that out of three cases trial is already concluded in two cases. All the three cases are similar in nature. 2.

Considering the statement made by learned counsel for the State, all the petitions are disposed of directing the concerned trial Judge to complete the trial of pending criminal case expeditiously. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri