← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/419/2015disposed off

Smt. Maheshwari Sahu v. Shri B. Rajiv

2015-09-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 419 of 2015 1.

Smt. Maheshwari Sahu W/o Shri Nageshwar Sahu Aged About 25 Years Working As A Anganbadi Worker, Posted At-, Mini Angan Badi Kendra Parsabhata, Garm Panchayat Chorbhathi, Police Station-Sarsiwa, Revenue And Civil District-Baloda BazarBhatapara Chhattisgarh (Petitioner) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

Shri B. Rajiv Collector, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Police Station Baloda Bazar, Revenue And Civil Dist. BalodabazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh 2.

Shri Ravi Kumar Sahu Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bilaigarh, Office Of The C E O, Janpad Panchayat Bilaigarh, Revenue And Civil District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 3.

I, Toppo, District Programme Officer, Womens And Child Development Officer, District Baloda Bazar, Tehsil, Revenue And Civil District- Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 4.

Sarsila Toppo, Project Officer, Integrated Womens And Child Development Office, Bhatgaon/ Bilaigarh, Revenue And Civil Distric Baloda Bazar Chhattisgarh 5.

Smt. Hema Banjare, Supervisor, Gatadih, Sector, Gram Panchayat Chorbhathi, Police Station-Sarsiwa, Revenue And Civil District-Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri Vinod Deshmukh & Shri Rupesh Shrivastava, Advocates For Respondent No.3 Shri R.S. Baghel, Advocate

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 22/09/2015 1.

At the very outset, Shri Baghel, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3, would submit that the respondent has already decided the representation and thereby complied with the order dated 15-4-2015 passed by this Court in WPS No.447 of 2015, though with some delay and for which learned counsel tenders apology for delay in deciding the representation. 2.

The apology is appears to be bona fide, therefore, it is accepted. 3.

In view of the above, nothing survives for taking any further action in the contempt petition.

4.

Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri