Smt. Pratibha Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5269 of 2021

1. Smt. Pratibha Sahu W/o Shri Sandeep Kumar Sahu Aged About 35 Years Hostel Superintendent At 100 Seated Girls Hostel, Borgaon Block Farasgaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

2. Smt. Sarita Sinha W/o Shri Harish Sinha Aged About 37 Years Cook At Government Girls Hostel, Borgaon Block Farasgaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

3. Smt. Bhawani Sarkar W/o Late Shri Malay Sarkar Aged About 36 Years Cook At Government Girls Hostel, Borgaon Block Farasgaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

4. Smt. Reena Singh W/o Shri Ranveer Singh Aged About 35 Years Cook At Government Girls Hostel, Borgaon Block Farasgaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

5. Smt. Bobby Sahu W/o Late Shri Ram Kumar Sahu Aged About 41 Years Cook At Government Girls Hostel, Borgaon Block Farasgaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. The Managing Director Holistic Education State Project Officer 2nd Floor, Unified Educational Building, Pension Bada, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. The Collector / District Mission Director Of Hilistic Education Kondagaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

5. The District Education Officer / District Project Officer Holistic Education Kondagaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. A. S. Rajput, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Jitendra pali, Dy. AG with Mr. Ayaz Naved, GA & Mr. Suyash Dhar, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

29.09.2021

1. The counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that he be permitted to make a representation to the respondent no.2 to 5 ventilating their grievances which arises on account of decision of the respondents in merging the 100 Seater Girls Hostel into Kasturba Gandhi Girls Residential School.

2. The limited relief is not opposed.

3. Counsel for the State however submits that as regards the petitioner no.1 is concerned, she is otherwise substantive post holder i.e. lecturer under the respondents and so far as petitioner no.2 to 5 are concerned, they were temporary employees engaged at 100 Seater Girls Hostel.

4. Given the said relief that petitioners seek for, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the petitioners, if they so want, prefer a representation within a period of 10 days to respondent no.2 to 5 and respondent no.2 to 5 in turn are directed to decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law in terms of the policy governing the field.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit