High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/57/2017allowed

Kamla Devi Tondon v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-01-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 57 of 2017 • Kamla Devi Tondon, W/o Bhagwat Prasad Tondon, Aged About 40 Years, Caste Suryavanshi (Scheduled Caste), Sarpanch Village Panchayat Meu, R/o : Village Meu, Post Meu, Tahsil : Pamgarh, Civil & Revenue District : Janjgeer Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Gate, Naya Raipur, Capital Complex, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 492001.

2. District Collector, Janjgeer Champa, Civil & Revenue District : Janjgeer Champa Chhattisgarh.

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Pamgarh, Tahsil Pamgarh, District : Janjgeer Champa (Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pamgarh, Tahsil : Pamgarh, District : Janjgeer Champa (Chhattisgarh)

5. Neelam Tondon, W/o Nathlal Tondon, Aged About 25 Years, Caste Suryavanshi, R/o : Village Meu, Post Meu, Tahsil Pamgarh, District : Janjgeer Champa (Chhattisgarh)

6. Laxmi Prasad Tande S/o Shri T R Tande, Aged About 56 Years, Posted At Janpad Panchayat, Pamgarh, Tahsil : Pamgarh, District : Janjgeer Champa (Chhattisgarh)

7. Branch Manager, State Bank Of India, Pamgarh, Tahsil : Pamgarh, Civil & Revenue District : Janjgeer Champa (Chhattisgarh)

8. Branch Manager , Allahabad Bank, Kosala, Pamgarh, Tahsil : Pamgarh, Civil & Revenue District : Janjgeer Champa (Chhattisgarh)

9. Branch Manager, Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank, Pamgarh, Tahsil : Pamgarh, Civil & Revenue District : Janjgeer Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents

For Petitioner Shri B. K. Chakrabarty, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Shashank Thakur, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 19/01/2017 I.A. No.1 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application.

In view of the order passed by this Court in Smt. Jyoti vs. General Manager, Canara Bank {MCC No.591/2016} holding that the provisions of the Limitation Act do not apply in the writ proceedings or in proceedings arising therefrom, there is no requirement of filing of application for condonation of delay. M.C.C. No.57/2017 This is an application for restoration of WPC No.2060/2016, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide Court order dated 16.11.2016.

On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, it is allowed and WPC No.2060/2016 is directed to be restored to its original number. Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala