Teejram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 3232 OF 2016

1. Teejram S/o Krishna Rathore, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Semariya, P.S. Lormi, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

2. Dheeraj Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Peela Singh Thakur, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Kirari, P.S. & Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

3. Mahendra Singh S/o Late Shri Balwan Singh Rathore, Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Malhar, Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

4. Shankar Mali S/o Late Shri Chhedi Mali, Aged About 65 Years R/o Milan Chowk Kududand, P.S. Civil Lines, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Principal, Secretary (Home) Department Of Home Affairs, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisarh

3. Secretary, Law & Legislation Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisarh

4. Director General Of Police (Jail) Department Of Home (Police), Police (Jail), Head Quarters, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Additional Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Deepak Gupta, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, J.

Order on Board Per Deepak Gupta, Chief Justice 02/01/2017 1.

After the matter was heard for sometime, the learned counsel for the

petitioners submitted that his limited prayer is only to the extent that the State Government may be directed to consider and decide the representations (Annexure P-3 to the writ petition) made by the petitioners.

2.

Learned State counsel submitted that the petitioners may be directed to file fresh representations before the State Government, which may be considered and decided in accordance with law. 3.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the State Government that this writ petition may be treated as representation and the contents thereof may be considered by the State Government and the State Government may take appropriate decision in the matter. The petitioners may be informed about the decision taken, on or before 31/03/2017. Sd/- Sd/- (Deepak Gupta) (Sanjay Agrawal) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Anjani