Rakesh Raman Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 1556 of 2018 • Rakesh Raman Singh S/o Shri Vishwanath Singh Aged About 59 Years Occupation- Service (Surveyor Assistant Land Protenction Officer, Agriculture Department), R/o- Mission Chowk Kedapur, Ambikapur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District- Sarguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Inspector Economic Offences Investigation Bureau, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner :

Shri Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate.

For Respondent/State :

Shri Anupam Dubey, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board 07/08/2018 Heard.

1. This petition is brought under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. with a prayer to modify the order dated 13.7.2018 passed in MCRC(A) No.539/2018 in which offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 201 of IPC have not been mentioned because of which applicant could not furnish bail.

2. It is submitted that the offences mentioned herein above were registered against the applicant from the very beginning and since it was not mentioned in the order of rejection passed by the Court below, therefore, it could not be mentioned in the bail petition as well. It is prayed that the

other offences registered against the applicant may also be added in the said order.

3. Learned State counsel has submitted that on verification from the concerned police-station it has been found that the offences mentioned hereinabove were registered against the applicants at the time when the bail application was presented and decided by this Court, hence, he has no objection if the modification is made.

4. Considered on the submissions made and perused the documents attached with the petition. It appears that the aforementioned offences were registered against the applicant from very beginning, therefore, the order that has been passed by this Court granting anticipatory bail to the applicant shall be deemed to have been granted with respect to the above mentioned offence as well. Hence, on the basis of this conclusion the petition is allowed. Offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 201 of IPC be read along with offences mentioned in paragraph-1 of order dated 13.7.2018 passed in MCRC(A) No.539/2018.

5. A copy of this order be made part of MCRC(A) No.539/2018.

6. The petition is, accordingly disposed off. Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) JUDGE Nisha