Smt. Dhanbai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1000 of 2018 Smt. Dhanbai W/o Laxminarayan Bhupendra Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Matiyari, P. S. Sipat, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through P. S. Sipat, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For the Applicant :

Smt. Kiran Jain, Advocate For the State :

Shri Sangharsh Pandey, Dy. Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /08/2018

1. This is the first bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.

2. Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No.116/2018 registered at Police Station Sipat, District Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 304(B), 201, 302 read with 34 of the IPC.

3. Case of the prosecution, in brief is that the deceased Rajnandini was the resident of village Matiyari. Her marriage solemnized with the Ramnarayan Suryavanshi on 09/05/2017. After the marriage Ramnarayan, mother-in-law Benabai and father-in-law Bhukhiram, brother-in-law Jainarayan, sister-in-law (Jethani) Premlata wife of Laxminarayan, sister-in-law (Nanad) Arti and Malti were harassing on account of demand of car as dowry. On 15/04/2018 said persons murdered the deceased and given it the shape of suicide.

4. Counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and falsely

implicated in the present case, therefore, she shall be released on bail.

5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

6. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant benefit of Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. to the applicant.

7. Consequently, anticipatory bail application is rejected. Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde