High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4716/2020disposed off

Kishore Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-12-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4716 of 2020

1. Kishore Sharma, S/o Shri Bhushanlal Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, Resident of Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur.

2. Upper Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur.

3. Joint Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. B.P. Shamra, Advocate along with Ms.

Anuja Sharma, Advocate For State : Mr. Sudeep Verma, Dy. Govt. Advocate ivek Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 07.12.2020

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition seems to be the non-consideration of the petitioner's representation seeking for upgradation of the gradings given in the ACR for the year 20132014 and 2014-2015.

2. According to the counsel for the petitioner for the entries made in the ACR of the petitioner for the aforesaid two years, the petitioner has already made a representation to the respondent no. 1. However, the same till date has not been considered and decided. The counsel for the petitioner submits that initially the authorities had the apprehension whether the entries so made can be revived

by specifically approaching to the authorities. The contents of the general books circular would show that under this RBC the power has been vested upon the authorities to upgrade the ACR once awarded.

3. Given the said contention by the counsel for the petitioner has made, let the representation which the petitioner has made to the respondent no. 1 be decided at the earliest, preferably within ninety days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. The petitioner would be entitled to make a fresh representation in addition to what the petitioner has already made in the past.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul